21 comments

  • hasyimibhar 1 day ago
    Why not use Vega-Lite[0]? It’s my go-to data viz DSL with Claude.

    [0] https://vega.github.io/vega-lite/

    • karakanb 1 day ago
      There are quite a few libraries for charts and visualization, there are not as many for actually combining many of them with layouts, different components and including the actual implementation of the backend. Dac aims to provide all that as a standard and an implementation.
      • hasyimibhar 1 day ago
        I mean that's what the Vega team is doing no? They are building the standard grammar (Vega-Lite), along with an implementation (Vega). And they are already quite established with rich ecosystem, and supports a ton of components[0]. The only thing missing is that it expects a CSV or inline data source. But it's probably not too hard to build an extension that connects to a data warehouse with an SQL query.

        [0] https://vega.github.io/vega-lite/examples

        • karakanb 1 day ago
          I am not sure we are on the same page, as far as I am aware Vega doesn't do layout, does it? E.g DAC could use Vega for the charts and still take care of everything else around it.
    • dleeftink 1 day ago
      Observable Framework[0] attempted to fill this niche for a while as well, and we'll likely see some of the implementation details in the new Observable Notebook 2.0 format too.

      [0]: https://github.com/observablehq/framework

  • 5-0 1 day ago
    DaC might be more distinguishable from DAC, although the context obviously also helps readers telling them apart.

    Yours sincerely, came here for another DAC

  • ktrnka 10 hours ago
    Love the idea. The ability to PR a dashboard would've helped us in multiple companies.

    The two big areas that could use some docs/work: - Auth (one company was healthtech, so we needed auth even on VPN. The other didn't have a VPN so we needed auth) - Hosting: If it just needs to be run in a container and it doesn't need to be restarted that's fine. Though if there isn't a hosting document it's often a sign of a service that will need someone to keep it running all the time

  • lexh 1 day ago
    Consider adding that snazzy gif in the README to the docs landing page. I went straight to the docs and then hunted for a screenshot to no avail.
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      That's a great idea, will do very quickly, thanks!
  • laurels-marts 21 hours ago
    What I’ve heard often is that the customer might want to build a dashboard using AI on the fly.

    Like imagine you have a site and there’s blank canvas. It has access to some data in the background. The user might be like “build a dashboard showing YoY performance of X and break down the shipments in a table by Y and Z”. Then the agent builds it and persists it such that when they log out and log back in they can see their custom dashboard they assembled themselves.

  • gervwyk 1 day ago
    Well done on the launch! We’ve doubled down on the apps as YAML paradigm a few years ago and its pay great dividends on all fronts, esp now with code gen spinning out apps faster than ever for us (generated yaml). Our largest app is well over 500k lines of yaml - for those complaining about 1000 lines lol. With the right tool stack and conventions its so much easier to read, write. review and maintain. Shameless plug, we’ve built Lowdefy (open source) and 100s of dashboards using it. Have a look and keen to unpack if you’re interested in sharing experiences. Specially have a look at what we did with operators for dynamic needs. https://github.com/lowdefy/lowdefy
  • crefiz 1 day ago
    I reckon this is a simplification of existing BIAC tools (eg, https://github.com/lightdash/lightdash)
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      Partly, yes. It is a simplification with the perspective that the agents would be the primary builders.
  • Hnrobert42 1 day ago
    Have you thought about how these dashboards could be built for an eink screen?

    For a while, I was thinking about starting a side project of selling E-ink screens with easily configured dashboards. The project would support hobbies who want to build dashboards powered by a raspberry pi or something. I never pursued it, but it seems like you are now halfway there.

  • pryanshu89 1 day ago
    I would really hesitate to use a 1000 lines of yaml and modify them. I never found YAML easy to modify after a certain size.
    • Hnrobert42 1 day ago
      You have trouble with them when you are modifying them by hand or using an LLM to do it? The purpose of this project is having LLMs do it. I found they are about as good at writing yaml as they are writing anything else.
  • xixixao 1 day ago
    Why do ppl think building something through yaml is ever a good idea??

    (I know why: for a platform it’s simpler to parse a yaml than to run code, but it’s almost never a good idea for anything that needs to scale in complexity)

    • cyberge99 1 day ago
      What is a better format that allows inline comments, is human readable, and can be easily converted to other formats (json, xml, et al)
      • Hnrobert42 1 day ago
        The comments are why I prefer YAML for config over JSON. Of course, JSON is great for many purposes, especially machine to machine. For human to machine, I prefer YAML.
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      DAC currently supports YAML and JSX, what else would be a good alternative?
  • m_ramdhan 1 day ago
    The "agents as primary user" framing is what makes this stand out from other dashboard-as-code tools. Having agents generate dashboards is one thing, but making those dashboards reviewable and standardized is the actual hard part. Curious about the semantic layer — when an agent modifies a metric definition in semantic/, how does validation work? Does DAC flag downstream widgets that would break, or is it more of a "trust but verify" model where you catch issues at render time?
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      Thanks! DAC does that kind of validation partially, although doesn't validate the usage of the downstream dashboards. That's a very nice idea though.

      In terms of validation it will validate queries, metric definitions, chart definitions and all ahead of time, before render. That way agents tend to validate their work much quicker.

    • seattle_spring 1 day ago
      Is this an AI generated comment? The format follows almost exactly the format of your other comments, down to the location of the em-dash.
  • MuffinFlavored 1 day ago
    Might want to add how this compares to other products in the space.

    Some that come to mind that are potentially tangentially related/similar:

    https://github.com/evidence-dev/evidence

  • MSaiRam10 1 day ago
    Semantic layer + validation is the interesting part imo, everything else is table stakes. would lead with that
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      That's a good point, thanks!
  • SomeHacker44 1 day ago
    The blurb about this is repeated several times but it is unclear to me what it actually does.
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      You write a few lines of YAML or JSX and you get a dynamic, interactive dashboard out of it. Do you have any suggestions on how to make it simpler?
  • sumeno 1 day ago
    Yet another "Show HN" that has existed for less than a week. I wish the rules against AI generated content were applied to all these too.
    • karakanb 1 day ago
      The project has been under development for over 6 months. We just open sourced it with a clean history. I am not sure what you expect here, should a project exist for months before it is worthy of a show post?
  • ajaystream 1 day ago
    [dead]
  • 3vo-ai 1 day ago
    [dead]
  • steelcustompro 1 day ago
    [flagged]
  • hogary 1 day ago
    [flagged]
  • Huzzi 1 day ago
    [flagged]
  • imcritic 1 day ago
    [flagged]