Accelerando (2005)

(antipope.org)

52 points | by eamag 1 hour ago

13 comments

  • flir 29 minutes ago
    The first three shorts, when initialy published, had a real "15 minutes into the future" vibe. Substantial ideas just thrown away as quick asides gave it that "acceleration" vibe - a society with its finger mashed on the fast forward button. William Gibson is positively static by comparison.

    Some of those throwaway ideas seem quaint now (there's some stuff about body modems I think?), but one of the interesting things about the book, to me, is the further away from "the present" it gets, the more like traditional SF it becomes: it slows down, gets more spaceopera-y. But those first three shorts were something special, and for me might be the best thing cstross has ever done. Right place right time I guess, like that album you first heard when you were fourteen.

  • colinb 29 minutes ago
    Do I remember correctly that one of the major characters in what we would now call an influencer with always-on video glasses? I think his spectacles get slashdotted at one point.

    I’m not sure which is the greater anachronism got me. That I didn’t find the idea of endless surveillance creep glasses bothersome at the time I read the book or that slashdotting is in itself a once current, now newly archaic term.

    • Hizonner 9 minutes ago
      The difference between Manfred and the influencers we have now was that he actually invented things, built things, and brokered huge deals while streaming everything.
  • losvedir 43 minutes ago
    I read this book a few years ago and it was just chock full of interesting ideas. I think I didn't really "get" it, or enjoy the story that much but I definitely was impressed by the imagination. Every once in a while I think of random things in it. IIRC, it was this book where corporations become kind of important, central entities at some point, and that resonates more and more these days.
  • FL33TW00D 22 minutes ago
    Anyone have recommendations on books that can rival the first part of Accelerando in number of prescient ideas about how the near future, pre singularity might look?

    My own list is:

      Starmaker by Olaf Stapledon
      Counting Heads by David Marusek
      Nexus by Ramez Naam
      Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge
    
    But I'm always on the look out for more! The more predictive the better!
  • Hizonner 12 minutes ago
    I'm happy to report that my timing attacks have succeeded in accessing this simulation's substrate. Lobsters are reviewing my paper.
  • clokkz 55 minutes ago
    I read this book a while ago, and when I heard about openclaw I immediately thought of the self aware lobster neural network in space.
  • okonomiyaki3000 1 hour ago
    I love this book! The part about the implication of digitized minds and long distance space travel was really eye-opening. It really makes you understand that, no, aliens are not visiting earth.
  • wainstead 38 minutes ago
    Read this over a decade ago and it’s been on my mind a lot lately. Very timely.

    The notion of the inner solar system being converted into computronium sounds less and less far-fetched with each passing month.

    • fellowmartian 15 minutes ago
      Is it? Literally nothing even remotely similar from the book is happening in reality beyond the lobsters’ broken command of language being similar to early GPTs, but even they seem to have had a better world model than our current SOTA.
  • xgbi 1 hour ago
    One of the founding books that really blew my mind and drove me on the path of software and hacking.

    I was 17 in 2005 and discovered it by chance, and I’ve been binging on hard sf since then. Matrix and this were really transformative for me.

    Also, for the longest of times I thought lobste.rs was a reference to this book :-)

    Charles has very interesting takes on the modern world on his blog. I still read it with great passion.

  • arisAlexis 1 hour ago
    Becoming more real every day
  • ktallett 1 hour ago
    Is this a post because of the fact it was released under CC or for a different reason?
    • stoneman24 58 minutes ago
      Not sure but one section of the book relates to the establishment of a polity where compute was the underpinnings of the society.

      Given the current build out of compute in the real world, there is discussion / speculation about the effects of the rush to an economy heavily based on AI and the costs / benefits of that end state society.

      If AI isn’t an bubble based on grift and hype that fizzles out

  • senectus1 53 minutes ago
    one of my all time fav sci-fi novels.