3 comments

  • skulk 2 hours ago
    Haven't looked into this in depth but sub-nanosecond sync for systems up to 10km apart is interesting since 10km is about 33 light microseconds. There is some trickery going on.
    • elromulous 1 hour ago
      It's totally possible to achieve synchronization better than light transmission time. For the purposes of synchronization, the speed of light delay, and any other delay are indistinguishable, and need not be distinguished.
    • ooterness 1 hour ago
      Two-way time transfer measures the round-trip propagation time. As a result, it's not directly relevant to the accuracy.
    • colechristensen 1 hour ago
      The gravity well time dilation is about 3.5 nanoseconds per meter per year near the surface of the earth. (time changes rate with altitude in a gravity well)

      Sub-nanosecond synchronization is getting into the relativity is measurable realm.

      • mike_hock 40 minutes ago
        That means you get a free clock cycle every 2-3 hours on top of a mountain compared to sea level!
        • brookst 4 minutes ago
          Datacenters in spaaaace!
    • UltraSane 1 hour ago
      Yes, it uses phased locked loops and measures phase difference between the master clock and the local clock.
  • roughly 43 minutes ago
    Haven't dug in on the technicals, but this is coming out of CERN, it looks like - and in that light, the links to "We're hiring" on that page almost feel like a flex...
  • LowLevelKernel 6 minutes ago
    Not on GitHub?