5 comments

  • legacynl 2 minutes ago
    > those sanctions failed to target Stark’s remaining connection to the Internet — an Internet service provider based in the Netherlands called MIRhosting.

    The fuck, i walk past the office of mirhosting every day

  • efitz 6 minutes ago
    I’ve been on the defender side of security my whole career.

    I know in some markets crime pays more than legitimate work, but it never ceases to amaze me how much thought, effort, planning, and engineering goes into providing infrastructure IT services for cybercriminals. The people involved definitely have the skills to be profitable at legitimate work; it just puzzles me that they choose to support criminals.

  • 0xAstro 56 minutes ago
    > Stark Industries Solutions

    jarvis, whats the status of my dutch servers

  • analog8374 21 minutes ago
    It would be nice if they named/prosecuted the people who paid them to perform the attacks.
  • DeathArrow 53 minutes ago
    After reading the article I am not sure what crime did they commit in the Netherlands.
    • bunbun69 9 minutes ago
      I feel like you’re only asking this because you disagree with their charges, not because you genuinely have no clue why they’re arrested.
    • msh 49 minutes ago
      The article spells it out clearly: charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.
    • binaryturtle 47 minutes ago
      > …charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities…

      I guess that's why.

    • SecretDreams 49 minutes ago
      > charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.

      Did you read this part?

    • DonHopkins 48 minutes ago
      [flagged]