3 comments

  • cpard 3 minutes ago
    SQL, JS, Excel are really hard to substitute because of how widely used they are by people. Even if something new comes up that it's objectively better, so far has always failed gaining traction because of this reality.

    I wonder though, is such a dialect better for agents? Have you tried to measure if an agent performs better expressing queries in such a language instead of SQL?

  • gavinray 23 minutes ago
    Julian Hyde (Apache Calcite author) has a side project called Morel

    Morel is an ML dialect that can compile set-producing expressions into bytecode that Calcite can execute against databases

    Sort of like "If you could query anything with SQL but it's ML instead"

    I bring this up because the example query looks very similar to Morel queries

    Neat xample of solving a combinatorial optimization problem with a single query that he posted recently to Twitter:

    https://x.com/i/status/2062066151841321370

    http://blog.hydromatic.net/2026/06/02/package-queries.html

  • anentropic 1 hour ago
    > Prela queries are readable even to those new to the language

    Not really, too many obscure symbols.

    Certainly learnable but I wouldn't say immediately readable.