U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bay Model

(en.wikipedia.org)

49 points | by tosh 1 day ago

10 comments

  • LucasLanglois 1 hour ago
    If you don't know Tom Scott, he has done a great video 4mn vide on the model where you can see it in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i70wkxmumAw
  • mattlong 9 minutes ago
    I highly recommend a visit. It’s only a beautiful ferry ride and nice walk along the waterfront away from San Francisco. A refreshingly retro and analog experience.
  • Robdel12 10 minutes ago
    This is neat to see. US army crops of engineers is a negative “word” to me after growing up in FL and they destroyed so many ecosystems. And the entire Everglades. They’re still at it now. My family has basically spent the past 30 years fighting a ware they put in on our natural creek. It killed the creek, it shrunk the flow to the size of the culvert.

    So, It’s neat to see something competent! Imagine if they modeled what cutting off the natural draining to the Everglades would do :p

  • carderne 17 minutes ago
    John McPhee talks about a similar model for the Mississippi River in “The Control of Nature” Well worth a read. Fun stories about Hawaii and Los Angeles too, iirc.
  • WillAdams 1 hour ago
    It's a shame that there isn't a series of articles on such models --- saw the Chesapeake Bay model (mentioned in a footnote) on a field trip when I was much younger (and it was still in active use for research I believe, yes, as my kids constantly tell me, I'm old).

    Simulation used to be essentially impossible, something one dreamed of, or had to pay for time on a Cray or similar supercomputer/cluster.

    Apparently, the Chesapeake Bay model was built just as that was becoming feasible:

    https://easternshorebrent.com/2017/11/30/doomed-progress-the...

    and has since been dismantled and a business park built on the site.

  • nkrisc 1 hour ago
    The distortion is interesting and something I didn’t realize the model included. I assume that it’s necessary because the effects of surface tension and the viscosity of water (and other effects?) change its behavior at this scale relative to the features of the model?
    • lorenzohess 12 minutes ago
      If I recall correctly, at an undistorted scale, the water would be so shallow that surface tension and viscosity would dominate, so the depths are exaggerated to keep the flow realistic.

      More specifically, tidal flow obeys Froude similarity, not Reynolds. Matching the model's Froude number to the real Bay's requires enough depth for gravity waves and tides to scale correctly, which the vertical exaggeration provides.

      But the distortion makes the flow too efficient, so copper strips are added throughout to achieve the right frictional resistance.

    • WillAdams 47 minutes ago
      Yes. Another technique was to use alcohol rather than water since it has lower surface tension, but that was only workable for smaller models (which were usually enclosed).
      • nkrisc 45 minutes ago
        I think a model this size full of alcohol would also be quite hazardous for several reasons.
  • redm 1 hour ago
    These are the kinds of interesting engineering challenges that were solved with human ingenuity and grit; I wish we were talking more about them to our youth to inspire imagination about what's possible.
  • contingencies 1 hour ago
    The fellow who lived next door to me told me of a similar model system used to model Sydney Harbour which he worked on in the 1970s. IIRC it was instrumented with electronics and linked to a VAX or similar early machine.
    • emmelaich 17 minutes ago
      The Aus Navy had a computer simulation of Sydney Harbour, dating from the 70s or maybe 80s. One particular feature of the system was a disk drive about 1m in diameter with about 12 heads. Cost a bomb, but I guess it was worth it.

      When I saw a demo, they had an easter egg of a Loch-Ness type monster in it.

      There's also a topographical map of the harbour at St Ives showground but it's purely non-hydrographical. But it's almost disappeared now through neglect.

  • obvioustourist 1 minute ago
    [dead]