6 comments

  • kryptiskt 1 hour ago
    This isn't SDL_gpu, that is part of SDL3. This is SDL_gp, an external lib which builds on the former.
  • HexDecOctBin 1 hour ago
    How is this different from SDL_Render? https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryRender
  • whateverboat 16 minutes ago
    https://github.com/dascandy/pixel

    I personally think this is better.

  • nnevatie 58 minutes ago
    The naming of the library is pretty confusing, considering SDL_gpu is an official part of SDL3.
    • feelamee 5 minutes ago
      naming of api functions too. They all prepended with "SDL_" as if this is SDL library, but it not.
  • matt-p 35 minutes ago
    Cool work!
  • bellowsgulch 1 hour ago
    Nice work. It sounds like you’re young, so you should know that basically no one makes a living from sponsor-based open source software, and even industry luminaries make chump change from their work.

    Notably, and I won’t name who, there have been recent blog articles posted here written by some industry leaders basically e-begging and it’s just the weirdest, saddest thing.

    As someone else who works in this space and has released internationally used free and open source software, if you want to make money off of your work, sell it, and ignore the class of developers who get mad that you don’t give away all of your hard work for free.

    You’ll talk to a whole lot of low class people like that on HN. Just a heads up from one experienced guy to a younger developer.

    • qweqwe14 32 minutes ago
      Why the downvotes? All of this is correct
      • mightyham 5 minutes ago
        Probably because they could easily have given the same advice without needing to call people on hn that encourage and support open source software "low-class".
      • krapp 10 minutes ago
        >Why the downvotes?

        Probably for calling open source developers sad low-class beggars. Also probably for the presumption that OP should be trying to hustle an income from a fork of an open source project that no one would be willing to pay for anyway, because there's no market for 2d renderers. They're all already free.

        It isn't only crass, it's stupid and crass.