19 comments

  • anigbrowl 1 hour ago
    Neat work, but the free tier lets you export 3 images a month and the alternative is a subscription? No thanks.
  • acomjean 1 hour ago
    It’s weird, because the center of the image will be more detailed, so how are they dealing with the “grid of pixels” that is on the display. Are they doubling up the wide angle.

    “Easy-to-understand framing The brackets over the viewfinder indicate the area covered by the more detailed lens. Frame your subject inside them to capture the best detail.“

    Reminds me of the old 3d cameras that took two photos at once through 2 lenses (on film)

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/206409326865?chn=ps&_trkparms=ispr%...

  • swah 1 hour ago
    If it works, Apple copies it soon enough...
  • trashcan2137 1 hour ago
    subscription camera app seems like peak comedy to me
    • VladVladikoff 3 minutes ago
      There was some video on reddit that I saw the other day where a man struggled to take a photo with his camera app because it kept popping full screen ads in front of everything else.
    • hoppp 3 minutes ago
      Yeah, at that point it's better to buy an external lens for the Iphone. Single purchase and better pictures.
    • furyofantares 1 hour ago
      Definitely not peak, my kid asked for a Rubik's Cube solver app which turned out to be subscription based, then wanted to tune her Ukelele with an app which turned out to be subscription based.
      • ChrisMarshallNY 1 minute ago
        That's what makes me sad about the current Tetris game, on iOS.

        One of my favorite games ever, and I'd gladly pay for an ad-free version, but they don't have it. I assume there's much more money to be made with ads, over subscriptions.

      • da02 0 minutes ago
        Did you buy it or show them a better way of doing it?
      • dxdm 44 minutes ago
        Gotta keep up with pitch inflation!

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concert_pitch

    • PaulHoule 1 hour ago
      There is Halide which I find completely uninteresting because I have a Sony A7iv. (Funny my latest piece of “gear” I am learning to use is a selfie stick because I can do stuff like https://mastodon.social/@UP8/tagged/selfie and I don’t see third party apps really improve on the official camera)
  • cantalopes 37 minutes ago
    I am co fused, 50% of photos look better in standard zoom and 50% of them look better woth photosynthesis. This is like an anti campaign for the app hinting "in the end it doesn't really matter"
  • roflmaostc 52 minutes ago
    The principle is similar to foveated imaging [1].

    Recently, Samsung introduced the ISOCELL platform which allows to select the area which will be recorded at higher resolution compared to other regions.

    There can be all sorts of different applications build around such as extracting higher resolution of text regions, etc [2].

    Of course, the lens needs to support this resolution but I think that will be default in the mid-term future.

    [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveated_imaging

    [2]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3799902.3811218

  • joe-dakroub 1 hour ago
    I like the idea of this app and the website is well done. Subscription isn't for me, but for folks who take a lot of photos and need this sort of thing, I can see it. Free tier could offer a few more photos per month.
  • zellyn 29 minutes ago
    Anyone know if they’re using the native camera resolution for the zoomed part or doing sensor fusion to get better quality than either alone?
  • eigenspace 2 days ago
    Very cool stuff, I've long thought there must be some fancy ways to get extra information for better image resolution by taking advantage of the other cameras.

    That said, I must also say that most of the side-by-side comparison photos shown here are somewhat impressive, and in some cases, the photosynthesis one just looks worse to my untrained eye.

    _______________

    I'll choose to take this as evidence of the fact that you're tacking a very difficult problem, and you're also being honest in your comparisons and not cherry-picking too aggressively.

    • dole 1 hour ago
      Some of the photosynthesis zoom-ins have overlays take a bit longer to load at higher resolution.
  • gepeake 1 hour ago
    This was actually a purported feature of the Pixel 3 camera. Google said it would be constantly taking photos and the different information captured as your hand moved slightly could be used to create higher information density photos. It didn't work very well at that point but the idea was cool!
    • ipsum2 1 hour ago
      That's not what's being described here. It's just combining the telephoto and wide angle photos.
  • BugsJustFindMe 15 minutes ago
    "This site was paused as it reached its usage limits. Please contact the site owner for more information."
    • sajomes 12 minutes ago
      It's back now!
      • BugsJustFindMe 4 minutes ago
        FYI you're serving multi-megabyte images on your landing page that could effectively be thumbnails.
  • hnthrowawayacct 1 hour ago
    very cool app, a few questions: why does the color "temp" of the image change between traditional iphone photography vs your app? it appears to both warm and cool the images. Also why is the contrast decreased, specifically in the library/book store example?
  • megraf 1 hour ago
    Pretty cool -- I built see ya' an app which allows you to connect N number of phones locally, and use one phone as the view finder + shutter, and the other(s) as the dedicated camera. I'm just using Apples native API, so it'll connect over bluetooth, wifi, direct, whatever pretty seamlessly. I don't collect any data, and it's 100% free.

    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/see-ya/id6792367530

    • forsalebypwner 1 hour ago
      That's super handy, thanks! I've been using one of those selfie monitoring screens and opening the camera to record video + turning on the flash, this app seems like a better way of accomplishing this
    • thih9 21 minutes ago
      Please post your own Show HN, or comment in “what are you working on” threads, or pick some other approach.

      I also have an app that uses device camera and I don’t write about it in mostly unrelated submissions.

    • boaztheostrich 1 hour ago
      What API are you using if you don’t mind me asking?

      That seems super cool! You could almost strap an iPhone to the back of your phone and see yourself for recordings.

      • megraf 1 hour ago
        Apple’s MultipeerConnectivity framework -- phones discover and talk over local wifi / bluetooth via MCSession, MCNearbyServiceAdvertiser, and MCNearbyServiceBrowser in PeerSessionManager.
  • PaulHoule 1 hour ago
    Left side and the right side look the same to me except some subtle differences in the color of shadows…. And another waitlist? Nein Danke.
  • alansaber 1 hour ago
    Isn't quite a lot of modern smartphone photography post-processing? Yes camera SAAS is extremely funny but I can kinda see it maybe
  • bigwheels 1 hour ago
    That demo looks like Minority Report level enhancement. Amazing if it really works, but I'll be damned if I'm paying for a SaaS camera app.
  • iamcoder18 1 hour ago
    Anything like this for Android or Pixels?
  • lattalayta 1 hour ago
    Similar idea to the discontinued Light L16 camera https://petapixel.com/2017/12/08/review-light-l16-brilliant-...
  • EGreg 1 hour ago
    Not just the app idea … but the WEBSITE — is VERY WELL DONE.

    I immediately signed up. (And offered to help bring users to this thing.)