Reviving a four year old reMarkable 2

(oskrim.github.io)

58 points | by tremguy 2 hours ago

11 comments

  • GCUMstlyHarmls 1 hour ago
    This is pretty refreshing to read. "Its just linux", seems to ship with SSH/root terminal enabled (over USB at least, with a simple way to enable networked access), built in webserver, just uses systemd for service control, etc.

    They even list it in the user guide https://remarkable.guide/guide/access/ssh.html along with an "developing software" guide https://remarkable.guide/devel/index.html.

    Maybe other tablets are like that too, to be honest I'm too poor to swing the 700-1000$ for what I can cover with an paper note pad (with the bonus of being able to comfortably sit my coffee cup on it, use any pen or pencil, rip pages out, drop it, forget it somewhere, etc etc) to buy one but at least it seems like a product I would support.

    • gruturo 54 minutes ago
      > Maybe other tablets are like that too, to be honest I'm too poor to swing the 700-1000$ for what I can cover with an paper note pad (with the bonus of being able to comfortably sit my coffee cup on it, use any pen or pencil, rip pages out, drop it, forget it somewhere, etc etc) to buy one but at least it seems like a product I would support.

      I have good news: they (RM2s) are often available on ebay for much less. People buy them thinking they're getting something like an android tablet, but they do nothing out of the box apart from showing docs and taking notes. Sometimes they're returned immediately for a full refund, but often they sit in a drawer, untouched, till they get offloaded on ebay for - comparatively - peanuts, letting us scoop them up and breathe new life into them (koreader rocks, to start with).

    • zeeZ 57 minutes ago
      "They" is not reMarkable AS. remarkable.guide is a community project.
    • thepoet 57 minutes ago
      I have a Kobo that was kept unused in a similar state for a few years until I decide to build an SDK platform to develop and deploy apps on it. My Kobo does not support apps on its Linux platform.

      I have been using it to read HN, as an RSS reader over my news and blog sources, generate audiobooks on topics I want to understand with ElevenLabs, Exa and OpenAI and listen via connecting its bluetooth to my speakers and even as a remote Claude Code & Codex approval sidekick.

      It is amazing that a $100 device with a single core and 512mb RAM can do so much and run for so long.

      Here is the open-sourced platform https://github.com/BandarLabs/Cobalt

  • som 12 minutes ago
    I'm still using my remarkable from 2020. Has been receiving updates since AFAIK. Happy customer.
  • hartator 14 minutes ago
    Several of my notes got lost in the ReMarkable cloud. I don’t think you are missing much.
  • graceful6800 1 hour ago
    There's a project called codexctl that can help you run an offline update to the latest firmware https://github.com/Jayy001/codexctl
  • bossyTeacher 37 minutes ago
    This is the achilles heel of modern tech. Devices are just so brittle and if it is not online 24/7 on returning back online, you need to perform incantations to get things working.

    Long shell life is a taboo in the tech world where 5 years is a long time.

    • steveBK123 5 minutes ago
      Yeah it's kind of comical the framing is that a device needs to be "revived" after four years. As SWEs we should probably all be a bit embarrassed for our trade, even in the alleged golden era of LLM induced productivity.

      I have all sorts of offline digital&analog mechanical/optical devices which just work decades and decades later. The weak point in any of my old tech is when theres a software component that needs to be reverse engineered and ported across multiple generations of CPU architecture / OS / API deprecations.

      I have 60 year old records, 35 year old CDs, 25 year old minidiscs that all still work fine. Properly developed film negatives are still fine decades later.

      Despite all the warnings about media impermanence and lifespans, it's always the software that screws it up first. I've lost more content from digital / streaming services because its imply vanishes than because a piece of physical media failed.

  • mfcl 1 hour ago
    Is part of the article missing? It ends abruptly.
    • tremguy 14 minutes ago
      I think you're right, the ending is a bit abrupt. Added a closing paragraph to the last section, thanks for pointing that out.
    • essive 39 minutes ago
      As did the reMarkable support for that device...
  • doublerabbit 1 hour ago
    Maybe this will restore my faith in digital tablets.

    I made notes, saved them. Only for the next morning to find my device out of battery and the notes missing. I don't get it, feels like I was zapped by some evil overlord that didn't want me recalling what I had written for the next part of my cartoon.

    Now just use good ole paper and pen.

    • tiagod 1 hour ago
      The tablet stopped being able to update just from sitting unused for a few years. That really decreases my faith, at least in reMarkable.
      • arjie 1 hour ago
        Easy to end up like this. Takes a lot of work to preserve. I had an Arch Linux desktop. Put it in storage to move to a different country and came back in a year. Booted fine, couldn’t upgrade. No feasible resolution. Reimaged it after a couple of hours (this was pre AI so you had to manually figure things out).
        • fsflover 56 minutes ago
          If you had Debian, the update would go with no problems.
          • arjie 52 minutes ago
            Indeed that is the case. I’ve been a Debian/Ubuntu user since Ubuntu came out. The Arch desktop was an experiment. Back to la salle de bian once again. But it is perhaps one of the few distribution (families) where this is true.
      • tatjam 1 hour ago
        I'm running my remarkable on some ancient software version, and honestly for my use case (reading textbooks and occasional note taking) the old version is perfectly fine.

        I don't connect it to the internet, just use the awesome RCU software (paid, but distributed with source code) to move stuff between it and my computer. I presume if I were to try to update it, I'll find the same fate! About exporting, the notebook format is relatively simple, I wrote a very bare-bones software that's able to convert the notebooks to PDF in a few hundred lines of Nim, or you could just use the integrated web UI.

      • reticulated 4 minutes ago
        Except it was able to be updated. Looks like mostly a time issue and having to restart the update service, possibly due to an old bug - or maybe a reboot would have fixed it.

        The rm@ is still receiving software updates. The fact that this would have been impossible on more closed tablets, or indeed most mobile phones should show reMarkable in a positive light surely?

    • usef- 1 hour ago
      On a remarkable, or other tablet? Sounds like a software issue, there's no reason for that to happen in 2026.
  • jacknews 1 hour ago
    woah 4 years is considered obsolete?

    My kids still using thinkpad 430 from 2013

    • jorams 1 hour ago
      > woah 4 years is considered obsolete?

      No, this device was only discontinued this year, you can still buy accessories and it still receives software updates.

      It just turns out their software has flaws that break the update process after a few years of sitting unused. Not great, but luckily there are workarounds, as this article walks you through.

    • essive 41 minutes ago
      LOL - agreed. I was a bit shocked by the title being the type that gets bonded with my devices. I still use my Windows laptop from 2017 and my M1 Macbook Pro from 2021 daily. Additionally, my Kindles are from 2010.
    • rwmj 51 minutes ago
      Next up, "reviving my paper notes from 40 years ago". Oh wait, there's nothing that I need to do, they still all work fine.
  • greatgib 1 hour ago
    Really sad the official lack of proper support for using it as a general purpose device for the ones that would like time because otherwise the hardware is really great.

    I like mine very much except the limitation that I can't do too much with it.

    • turtlebits 35 minutes ago
      It barely has enough power to render PDFs, I'm not sure what general purpose use you could get out of it.

      The limitation is the whole point, it does pen input very well.

    • carlosjobim 1 hour ago
      What exactly is a "general purpose device"? An eInk tablet is pretty far away from being "general purpose" as far as I can tell. Should I buy a Ford Ranger and demand that the company makes it easy to convert it to a lawn mover?
      • kstrauser 51 minutes ago
        Examples: it sucks as an ereader, even though the hardware is super capable of it. It doesn’t have a built-in dictionary to look up words or check spelling. You can’t make links between documents or to different pages in the current document.

        Their hardware is top notch, but I found the software to be so hamstrung that I returned mine after a few weeks. Basically, if you want to have exactly a physical paper notebook experience but with a computer, it’s great. If you’d like to transcend the limitations of a paper notebook and take advantage of the nice hardware to organize your work, or do literally anything but write or draw, you’ll be sorely disappointed.

        • reticulated 3 minutes ago
          Please point to the marketing page where it's primary purpose is declared as an ereader.

          My car has four wheels, that doesn't make it a good ice-cream van

  • onesandofgrain 1 hour ago
    Why not use paper and pencil?
    • fancyfredbot 11 minutes ago
      Pencil and paper are very definitely better, until you need to carry them around or search through them.

      The ease of filing/retrieving across a lot of notes is a huge advantage. Also the amount you can have with you. The sheer weight of paper is a huge pain. With this you can carry hundreds of books and search the notes you scribbled in the margins.

    • seanhunter 33 minutes ago
      I don’t use a remarkable but use an ipad and stylus for note taking a lot, so can totally get why people like remarkable even though I what I do is better for me[1]. The reasons for me:

      1) I had a ton of paper notes, looking back, curating, finding old things etc is really hard.

      2) An electronic device gives you the ability to cut and paste, move things around on the page, resize stuff, drop in screenshots (so I often screenshot a page of something I’m reading, drop it into a note and annotate it or make my notes about it all around the original) and (best of all) infinite erase with no skank left behind on the page and no surrounding myself with tiny little bits of eraser to clean up.

      3) I have all my notes with me on my device even ones I made years ago vs in my study I have box folders and notebooks full of notes filling cabinet after cabinet, I couldn’t possibly carry all that around with me.

      1 and 3 are nice, 2 is the killer app. Once I made the switch I find it painfully limiting to go back to having to make notes on paper.

      [1] My system in case people are interested is Notability and a paperlike screen protector. It is fantastic. All notes back up automatically as pdfs in box (which I then copy to my linux laptop) and I can search them using AI just fine even though I’m writing equations and my handwriting is god-awful. The notes are all pdf so if notability gets bought out and becomes terrible I just drop it like a hot potato and move on to something else no loss of notes. I tried a colleagues RM2 and the screen didn’t feel as nice to write on as my paperlike screen protector. I also found the latency distracting - I couldn’t write as fast as I would like to.

    • darkfloo 30 minutes ago
      Because the fact that it is a tech gadget makes me more likely to write stuff down instead of believing I can remember everything. That’s about it , at least for my use case
    • tremguy 12 minutes ago
      Paper is great for notes, bad at rendering arXiv
    • swasheck 58 minutes ago
      i’ll address this as if it was a genuine question.

      my handwriting is awful, not to mention that my physical notebook management is awful. i’ve considered a supernote nomad as a way to streamline some of those issues. theyre just so expensive that i cant really justify a $500 experiment.

      • goda90 36 minutes ago
        I haven't tried it myself but I have heard that LLMs can be much better at handwriting OCR than previous tech. This opens the possibility of handwriting and then scanning and digitizing notes for organizing and search.
        • onesandofgrain 28 minutes ago
          Honestly, this seems like a good opportunity to just write slower and pay closer attention to the tidiness of your handwriting. Using digital notetaking because your handrwriting is bad is just lazy. If you have parkinson fair.
      • rwmj 49 minutes ago
        I'm confused. Your physical notebook management is awful, ie. I guess you have live in a house without shelves or something. But spending time troubleshooting an electronic device from only 2022 is easier?
      • onesandofgrain 50 minutes ago
        Isnt a remarkable 500$ too?
    • emil-lp 1 hour ago
      Why didn't you write that comment on a piece of paper instead?
      • onesandofgrain 49 minutes ago
        This a social platform. Not a note-taking app. Besides why are you so triggered by my question?
        • emil-lp 43 minutes ago
          I'm not particularly triggered, I didn't downvote you, if that's what you think.

          This is a platform to discuss all things related to tech. The suggestion that the OP discards their old tablet seems not in the true hacker spirit.

          But, that's only my 5 cents.