Was Modern Art a CIA Psy-Op?

(daily.jstor.org)

17 points | by neom 1 hour ago

5 comments

  • mauvehaus 3 minutes ago
    Oh man, I just listened to an episode of Decoder Ring about why making classical realist sculptures in the US is a challenge. It gives some interesting context about the rejection of realism in the post-war West:

    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/we-are-monumentally-ba...

  • NordStreamYacht 2 minutes ago
    More likely it was a money laundering operation disguised as a psyop.
  • Barbing 25 minutes ago
    And here I was thinking any psyop was necessarily bad.
    • gigatree 22 minutes ago
      Are you saying modern art is positive?
      • math-man 20 minutes ago
        Do you not appreciate art?
        • NordStreamYacht 6 minutes ago
        • greenavocado 1 minute ago
          Modern art is either fodder for low IQ troglodytes or encoded occult virtue signalling. It is misanthropic at its core and offensive. You can keep it.
        • bigstrat2003 6 minutes ago
          I love art. Contemporary art is a bunch of ugly wankery by pretentious people who are bored of actual beauty and can only amuse themselves by creating ugly stuff, then claiming "you just don't get it". The world would be a significantly better place without contemporary art in it.
          • karmakurtisaani 2 minutes ago
            This could have been written at any point after the 1850s or so.
          • cindyllm 5 minutes ago
            [dead]
  • Eufrat 6 minutes ago
    Sounds like it was more about spreading American culture as part of the Cold War. This feels a lot more benign compared to Modernist architecture which seems to have fascist tendencies what with Le Corbusier and Philip Johnson being literal Nazi sympathizers.
  • colechristensen 22 minutes ago
    “educate, inspire, and strengthen the hearts and wills of free men.”

    Funny how times have changed and more or less everyone on every side is fighting for the strength and survival of their own groupthink and little more.

    • sublinear 3 minutes ago
      Eventually, people realize they will never agree and therefore don't have to fight.

      They realize the majority of their beliefs already existed before they were born and will continue on after they're dead. They have nothing to add to the conversation while they are too busy fighting. They turn their focus to developing their ideas peacefully and let their subcultures flourish once again.

      This isn't the first cycle and won't be the last. The last major cycle was in the 20th century due to broadcast media. I think people sometimes forget how relatively young the internet is.