Why not juat write the code. Its not that much faster to produce good code with AI. I spend nearly identical amoubts of time reviewing AI code as it would take to write. Im honestly not convinced there is all that much of a productivity boost, maybe 20% faster.
Genuinely of the best reasons to build a tool tho? "I had a problem X, so I did nothing and kept complaining (without LLM)" would be pretty tiring to me personally
The problem is that anyone can type "I have this problem, plz fix" into Claude Code.
What unique insight or skill did they bring to the process? That's the interesting part. Otherwise it's just a small part of a huge sea of people's individual attempts to solve the same problems that everyone else is solving by themselves.
That is a very common title format for HN, and has been for a while. It wasn't just since AI has evolved—it has always been a load bearing part of HN
23 em-dashes in the span of a single README. I gotta hand it to Anthropic. They seriously managed to find a completely legal way to sell crack to crack addicts using other crack addicts as their unpaid sales force.
What unique insight or skill did they bring to the process? That's the interesting part. Otherwise it's just a small part of a huge sea of people's individual attempts to solve the same problems that everyone else is solving by themselves.
Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
If you're going to fully vibe code a repo, maybe we should get the build artifacts (i.e., the claude session).
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
> If you're going to fully vibe code a repo,
I'm not the OP.
100% Human written slop