The title is super-clickbaity, as no scholar believes in a single Pre-Greek language; this was the idée fixe of the scholar Robert Beekes, and very flawed research as Beekes was succumbing to dementia then.
The article does eventually mention the current state-of-the-art, but only after perpetuating the misconception, and that is poor form for a pop-sci article.
> early Greeks, and especially the Mycenaeans (c. 1750–1050 BCE), are associated with major advances in technology (including writing)
I’ve been doing a bit of reading on the Bronze Age Collapse recently. It was such an apocalyptic event that Greeks forgot how to write and read.
Before the collapse Greeks Linear A and Linear B. It took them a few hundred years after the Bronze Age Collapse to learn how to write again, this time by borrowing the Phoenician alphabet.
Imagine what an event would look like today that would take us back 200-400 years technologically.
The article does eventually mention the current state-of-the-art, but only after perpetuating the misconception, and that is poor form for a pop-sci article.
I’ve been doing a bit of reading on the Bronze Age Collapse recently. It was such an apocalyptic event that Greeks forgot how to write and read.
Before the collapse Greeks Linear A and Linear B. It took them a few hundred years after the Bronze Age Collapse to learn how to write again, this time by borrowing the Phoenician alphabet.
Imagine what an event would look like today that would take us back 200-400 years technologically.