Muse Gadgets

(gadgets.muse.ai)

50 points | by anant 2 hours ago

18 comments

  • belval 4 minutes ago
    I'll go against the grain and say that I like this, I genuinely don't think this is anything but some internal team being excited about their product and giving you some firmware to connect stuff to their agents. Meta the trillion dollar company will not move at all from this.
  • modeless 3 minutes ago
    Literally yesterday I ordered an ESP32-C5 board to build a home network proxy for cloud agents (not limited to Muse), and today they announce this. I guess this is confirmation I'm on the right track.
  • TomGarden 55 minutes ago
    The larping as a grassroots/open source product is really off-putting. The only reason anyone would use this is that its "free" and comes with preloaded prompts for non-technical people.

    No thanks.

    • logancbrown 30 minutes ago
      LARPing would imply pretending to do something, but not actually doing it. Here they appear to be actually doing it (open source product). Is there something Im missing?
      • mh- 27 minutes ago
        A surplus of outrage and a willingness to share your unfiltered reactions to things, I guess.
        • verdverm 26 minutes ago
          celebrities and billionaires always catch more heat, can we not call out their bs?
      • verdverm 28 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • logancbrown 9 minutes ago
          Your response is unrelated to the content of this thread (the open sourcing of hardware/software)
  • karmakaze 1 hour ago
    It says make it your own. Then

    > Gadgets you build with the Muse Gadget SDK need a token. Add it to your SDK configuration so your gadgets can pair with the Muse app.

    > Each token can be used by a limited number of devices.

    > The Muse Gadget SDK is intended for personal tinkering and is not a supported product or developer platform. The SDK can change, break, or stop functioning without warning.

    Doesn't really feel like it's my own.

    • therealpygon 1 hour ago
      Clearly you just made the completely unique mistake of not understanding it’s more like the “ownership” of digital movies, games and music where there is clearly no ownership. That is completely obvious to anyone who would see the word “own”…at least according to most companies court filings.

      (I joke, but not really…)

      • verdverm 27 minutes ago
        our digital landlords, we are but serfs
  • zmmmmm 20 minutes ago
    The general theme of meta's approach across the board here is interesting - basically, they are trying to win in part by taking risks others aren't willing to. I can imagine they saw that all the success is coming so far when a someone is willing to cross a boundary that wasn't previously thought acceptable - from releasing ChatGPT in the first place, to things like OpenClaw.

    So now they are actively distributing SDKs and to let people "hack" custom hardware integrations to their already risky AI agents unleashed on the general public. Giving agents abilty to control things in the physical world - what could possibly go wrong?

    But here we are: so far the story is pretty much 100% "fortune favors the bold", and Meta is leaning into it.

  • compiler-guy 16 minutes ago
    Even ignoring all the privacy issues Meta has (and they are many, and we shouldn't), Zuck is happy to do a rug-pull on his users whenever he feels like it.

    "Facebook's main purpose isn't really to connect with friends any more."

    If he wakes up tomorrow and decides everything should be different, and that ruins your plans, well tough beans for you. I wouldn't touch this with a ten-foot pole.

  • MetaverseClub 1 hour ago
    Please do not waste hardware (nowadays valuable) on Meta's privacy-leaking garbage.
  • bauerd 1 hour ago
    A Meta ecosystem is definitely not coming to my household.
  • hollowturtle 26 minutes ago
    100% vibe coded page
  • kelvinjps10 1 hour ago
    This being Facebook is hard to trust with everything even considering they already have a lot of info on you
  • sampsn 28 minutes ago
    ill wait for the inevitable "foss community open source alternative" version
  • pastel8739 1 hour ago
    I am gonna be so pissed if ESP32 prices spike
    • xurui1982 1 hour ago
      Will not limited to ESP32.
    • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
      And a lot of us would feel the same way, so to prevent this, we start buying a bit more, prices raise a bit, so a bit more people get scared and...
  • Hamuko 21 minutes ago
    Was this the AI that gives strangers your home address or am I confusing it for something else?
  • sailfast 45 minutes ago
    Why would I ever want Facebook to have access to anything I own, think, or post if I could avoid it?
  • zakcohen 1 hour ago
    So many possibilities, especially connecting to the real agent :D
  • pclark 26 minutes ago
    I wish Anthropic would robustify their bluetooth implementation (Developer > Hardware Buddy...)
  • mcphage 1 hour ago
    Just think of the possibilities—previously Muse invited someone to the user's house from Facebook Marketplace, but sadly the user wasn't home, and so got angry. But if you connect Muse to your Internet of Things—why, Muse could just unlock the door for your guest! You don't even need to be aware that they're coming. Surprise guests!
    • jddkj 1 hour ago
      It was discovered that the person hit "always approve" when their muse asked them if it could give out their address.
      • nater5000 1 hour ago
        Oh, thank God it was such a specific and unique human error. There's no way almost everybody using AI via Meta products aren't just clicking "always approve" on their app lol
      • dominotw 33 minutes ago
        this guy reads every single eula an cookie popup
  • ngd 1 hour ago
    Thats very @dps