7 comments

  • McScrooge 20 minutes ago
    https://docker.github.io/docker-agent/configuration/sandbox/

    If, like me, you couldn't find any security-related info on the linked page.

  • maxdo 12 minutes ago
    they hope they can annoy and email every person in the org asking for money , same way as they did it with docker.

    looks like a weird abstractions. why do i need this if i have modal.com, e2b, cloudflare that use original docker + some toolings around + way to run + isolations on network level.

  • blakeashleyjr 26 minutes ago
    While I love new open source dev (especially in Go!), agent harnesses are turning into JS frameworks from yesteryear.

    All the cool kids have one!

    • pjmlp 21 minutes ago
      Coupled with VSCode forks to manage them
  • tamimio 17 minutes ago
    >What it is, what it isn’t

    Yep, open ai sol model wrote that.

    • lukemercado 13 minutes ago
      It frustrates me that there's a prisoners dilemma in communicating this to other humans. If I flag it and write it out (as you've done) I've let the author know that they're losing trust and let others know that they should be more skeptical. I've also created the perfect eval data pair for the ai labs. It's deeply frustrating.
  • mplewis 23 minutes ago
    What does this have to do with Docker?
    • speedgoose 15 minutes ago
      I guess people at Docker wanted to make an agent.

      Having it docker branded, I could understand. It’s confusing but the docker brand is strong.

      But exposing it as a docker subcommand is very confusing to me.

      • binsquare 14 minutes ago
        It reads to me like chasing trends
        • throwitaway222 9 minutes ago
          That's the economy we've always been in. X is popular, if your company doesn't have a solution for X you're irrelevant.
    • redleader55 17 minutes ago
      The quest for staying relevant.
  • mococa 19 minutes ago
    Pretty vague
  • oxcartctl 13 minutes ago
    [dead]