Roku developer repositories moved from GitHub to GitLab

(blog.roku.com)

65 points | by cxr 54 minutes ago

12 comments

  • rr808 3 minutes ago
    Worth mentioning that Roku is being acquired by Fox so in the virtue battle with Microsoft neither are clean
  • prologic 15 minutes ago
    Did this back in ~2021 for my own repos :D https://prologic.blog/posts/2021-07-11-why-i-no-longer-trust...
  • tangotaylor 24 minutes ago
    I wish they would spill some tea and articulate why they moved.
    • jeron 21 minutes ago
      why? like having a dozen outages in the last couple months isn't a good enough reason why?
      • misnome 0 minutes ago
        GitLab is just as bad, just not as big so doesn't get the coverage. https://status.gitlab.com/pages/history/5b36dc6502d06804c083...

        And of course many people self-host which changes a lot of the equation (which you can also do with GitHub, but not for free - and FWIW our self-hosted premium gitlab has about an hour a day downtime, which we've been told by the team responsible is an unavoidable side-effect of backing up gitlab).

      • tinyhouse 6 minutes ago
        No horse in this race but GitLab has been down a few times recently too.
      • prologic 16 minutes ago
        Or Microsoft/OpenAI (and others) just blatantly scraping all your codebases and violating thousands of OSS licneses?
        • pjmlp 2 minutes ago
          If the repos are public, hosting location doesn't make a difference.
        • echelon 2 minutes ago
          We're going to need something more expansive than OSI software licenses for the future.

          Something like, "if you look at us, we must be able to look at you"

  • steffenfrost 29 minutes ago
    A devops friend of mine said GitHub turned into a hot mess.
    • valyala 19 minutes ago
      Because of unreviewed AI code at GitHub services?
      • cdmckay 16 minutes ago
        Or maybe because the use of GitHub has skyrocketed?
  • pinkgolem 19 minutes ago
    We did the same, quit happy
  • outfitx 25 minutes ago
    Why? Any specific reasons?
    • jacquesm 15 minutes ago
      Do you have some time?
      • rlonstein 5 minutes ago
        >> Why? Any specific reasons?

        > Do you have some time?

        Okay, I laughed.

  • CyanLite2 16 minutes ago
    GitLab will eventually just get overran with 24/7 agents spewing from their AI Slop Cannons
  • robinhood 6 minutes ago
    So they replaced a tool from an evil corporation by another one disguised as an open source project.
    • sidcool 5 minutes ago
      This logic baffles me. This would mean no one gets any work done and we go in a perennial cycle of victimhood
  • skullone 39 minutes ago
    The readme.md still says welcome to their GitHub repository :D
  • BatchJob 4 minutes ago
    I always found it wierd that people flocked to github. The app sucks, if I have to use it for work it infuriates me at nearly every turn with its sad excuse for UI. People like free sh*.

    As for gitlab...yuck. But whatever. Most of the dev tool space is really just "sh* we have to put up with now", none of it is any good, all of it is dated from the early aughts, and taken as a whole is even worse because none of it works together.

    While software development itself got better in the last ten years these tools stayed the same or got worse (enshittification). And this is part of why folks are self hosting.

    The other part is that AI is destroying the Internet and its time to pack your bags anyway. The smart people already have.

  • neya 23 minutes ago
    Good. I want everyone to do this. I want to see the downfall of Microsoft. Time and again they've proved that anything they touch can't be trusted nor reliable. I am tired of this. They even bully their users - on Mac OS, GitHub desktop doesn't respect the word "no". It installs all kinds of helpers and acts like borderline spyware. Someone created an issue about it on Github and the MS employees told them to fuck off in corporate[1]

    I am even considering hosting my own GIT server myself. Some of our deployments got affected multiple times in the last 6 months alone we were really caught off-guard. Thankfully our clients were understanding of the GitHub outages. But, this should not be the baseline. Reliability should not be the cost of doing business.

    [1] https://github.com/creativefoundrysg/desktop#an-open-letter-...

    • pixl97 5 minutes ago
      >Good. I want everyone to do this

      Every other free service would die nearly instantly, so maybe only want useful things to move to other services.

      >I am even considering hosting my own GIT server myself.

      It's mostly a good idea.... but, with the current security apocalypse we seem to be under making sure your own shit doesn't get pwned is a full time job. The level of security hostility on the internet recently has reached numbers I've never seen before. RCE's dropping about every day, more targeted scans than I've ever seen in my life, swarms of AI bots breaking into services.

      • sedan_baklazhan 2 minutes ago
        Running an up to date self hosted Gitea server takes like 5 minutes a week.
    • valiant55 15 minutes ago
      I'm hosting Forgejo for my homelab and couldn't be happier. I have everything running in containers with dind for CI/CD. Most of my workflows just worked with minimal changes. YMMV and this is far from an enterprises' needs but it's working great so far for my needs.
    • 999900000999 11 minutes ago
      As an idea, do you think an enterprise only Git host would work.

      Say annual contracts start at 100k minimum and everyone gets a dedicated support engineer.

      You get your own rack. None of this degraded shared capability nonsense.

      Does that seem like a solid business ?

    • to11mtm 16 minutes ago
      Github desktop is such a hot mess that I instead choose to continue to suffer with SourceTree. Sourcetree annoys me for reasons I still cannot articulate after a decade, but it at least tends to actually work without being too intrusive as far as updating, doesn't randomly derp out on credentials, and is super handy when trying to visualize janky branch patterns of dev teams.
      • latsu 15 minutes ago
        Just use Sublime Merge, it's probably the best GUI for Git there is.