18 comments

  • ceroxylon 45 minutes ago
    There is a lot of money involved in getting Bolsonaro back in power:

    > Brazil’s government announced Friday that annual deforestation in the Amazon fell to its lowest level since records began in 1988 [. . .] During Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency, from 2019 to 2022, Amazon deforestation surged by about 60% [0]

    This highlights the greatest difference between these two candidates (imo), one wants to preserve the 'lungs of the Earth', the other wants to rip them out for profit and give the world a middle finger on their way out.

    [0] https://apnews.com/article/brazil-amazon-deforestation-lula-...

  • nidnogg 4 hours ago
    It’s sad but it’s real and it’s happening. In Brazilian news, this is actively being exploded upon and it is not reaching mainstream media properly.

    [1] - https://www.instagram.com/reel/De2BfVRD30o

    [2] - https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/10/16/meta-employees-...

    • matheusmoreira 22 minutes ago
      I wouldn't attribute an eventual Lula defeat to this, however.

      His 3rd term was terrible, dozens of new taxes were implemented, living costs rose, purchasing power declined, and it became obvious that he was governing through the supreme court. His campaign was overconfident and taken completely off guard when they got utterly eviscerated in the 1st round of elections earlier this month. Left wing desperation was palpable.

      Partidarian judges and journalists did everything they could to help Lula, but after the presidential debates on live television, it's pretty much over. There's just no way this guy is even fit to lead the nation ever again.

      • saulapremium 13 minutes ago
        Funny, that sounds exactly like what an American right-winger would say about Biden in 2024.

        I guess Brazil is about to experience a shit-show similar to what the US is going through now, then. Not much hope left anywhere.

        • matheusmoreira 0 minutes ago
          Lula went on national television and said he's going to end police in reply to Bolsonaro vowing to classify the drug traffickers as narcoterrorists.

          It's not even a lie. These leftists do want to abolish the police and create a bolivarian national guard or whatever.

          He says this while organized drug gangs have been known to wage literal drone warfare in Rio de Janeiro. I'm not even kidding.

          https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/nacional/sudeste/rj/operacao-no...

          I seriously doubt he's going to recover from this.

  • roenxi 52 minutes ago
    It is somewhat confusing to me that more countries don't treat Meta as a political threat. China's approach to restricting access to western internet companies looks more and more reasonable in hindsight. The US tech giants appear to be politically active and becoming more and more willing to influence elections. I don't like the strategic situation of any anti-US political parties with Facebook in the mix (not a comment on Lula, about whos policies I know little).

    That being said, it is a complex issue. There are countries that refuse to embrace US style free speech and so there is a natural pressure to move political speech to US-controlled media platforms as a result. The average quality of the chatter is higher.

  • goshx 2 hours ago
    At the same time, some candidates from the opposition are getting more views than Beyoncé and other artists known globally.

    https://sleepinggiantsbrasil.com/biblioteca/visualizacoes-de... (portuguese)

    • Terr_ 2 hours ago
      To save others a couple clicks:

      > [Auto-Translated] The Sleeping Giants Brazil report analyzes 300 Reels of 30 Instagram profiles to investigate evidence of algorithmic favoring to federal deputy Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG). Its ten videos totaled 410.5 million views, nearly three times the total of the 90 videos of the other nine MPs analyzed. In views by follower, its performance was 17.2 times the typical value of these deputies, 29.3 times that of the largest Brazilian profiles and 33.7 times that of the largest profiles in the world. His average viewing was behind only Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi, surpassing celebrities such as Selena Gomez, Beyoncé and Justin Bieber. The study documents a persistent disparity that requires more transparency from the Meta, although public data does not allow it to determine its causes.

    • nidnogg 2 hours ago
      Both sides are pulling record levels of engagement. It's a colosseum out there. But yes, one of the sides is more automated as usual. Most of the left engagement is human driven.
    • Jensson 1 hour ago
      Looks at least partially organic to me, the guy is very cute and looking at his youtube video it is full of female commenters and has 2.7m subscribers.

      So he is a celebrity and not just a politician, probably a lot of women are in love with him.

  • Kapura 2 hours ago
    meta employees will look at this and think that their job isn't political. what a j o k e.
  • msandford 2 hours ago
    At a certain point the big social media companies are going to have to publish their algorithms and/or let you choose your own re: friends updates, friends of friends, things your friends or friends of friends liked, etc. Make your algorithm too opaque and you run the risk of outrage engagement showing up as "the platform pushed this" whatwver that happens to be.
    • matheusmoreira 33 minutes ago
      X did publish their algorithms.

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310291

      They set the standard in transparency.

    • Vaushite 1 hour ago
      I don't think anything will force them to do this. Can you elaborate on why you think they'll be forced to do this?
    • verdverm 39 minutes ago
      Algorithms are something we should definitely regulate, as a generalization of social media and Ai decisions over human lives.

      I'd like to see something like ATProtocol feeds forced upon these companies, anyone can create any kind of feed, it works in all clients.

  • prajaybasu 44 minutes ago
    Good.
    • tuwtuwtuwtuw 24 minutes ago
      How is it good that companies in the US is interfering with elections in other countries? Seems like a bizarre take.

      Are you one of the guys that support the pedophile Trump and believe everything he says to he gospel?

  • silverFork 3 hours ago
    Did you expect more from FaceBook?
  • SwellJoe 35 minutes ago
    "Any suggestion that Meta favors one side is false"

    Weird how it keeps happening (e.g. just last week, Instagram and the No Kings account), and it's always to the benefit of right-wing extremists. I'm sure it's just an accident, though, surely they wouldn't lie on the internet.

  • moribvndvs 2 hours ago
    It’s just a technical issue that seems to magically and repeatedly happen in favor of right wing interests. Crazy how that just works out some times.
    • matheusmoreira 43 minutes ago
      The Brazilian left has done much worse than whatever it is that Meta is doing.

      > We have defeated Bolsonarism!

      Luís Roberto Barroso, former Brazilian Supreme Court Justice.

    • EdwardDiego 1 hour ago
      Whoopsie! A slight technical error that aligns with the politics of the White House, it's wild how that happens from time to time to time to time...
    • derektank 1 hour ago
      Facebook has also made content decisions that have hurt right wing interests in the past, such as in 2020 when they banned several accounts affiliated with Bolsonaro

      https://www.reuters.com/article/world/facebook-suspends-disi...

  • platevoltage 2 hours ago
    I hope to see Mark dragged in front of congress every day of his life next year.
    • oefrha 1 hour ago
      For flexing muscles and advancing U.S. foreign policy goals abroad? Doubt it.
  • ChrisArchitect 3 hours ago
  • gnabgib 4 hours ago
    Title: Meta employees say Lula’s accounts restricted in Brazil election: Report

    > don't editorialize.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

    • nidnogg 2 hours ago
      Apologies! Fixed the title now
  • barbazoo 1 hour ago
    I only use FB occasionally for marketplace with an empty account. All that it's ever suggesting in the home feed is hateful, right-wing content. Never anything positive. It's so sad that that's what drives the metrics these people care about. If this is your job, shame on you!
  • matheusmoreira 47 minutes ago
    Don't be fooled. Whatever it is that Meta is doing, it's only a fraction of what Lula, his party and his supreme court ministers did to the Brazilian right wing. Censorship was the least of it.

    I'm not even denying that it's happening. I'm just saying I don't care.

  • d--b 1 hour ago
    Is this a Trump thing?

    Like is the motivation to please Trump and ask for stuff/be left alone? Or is Zuckerberg really gone full right wing globally?

    • rf15 1 hour ago
      No, it's the lawnmower analogy again: Zuckerberg has no political views, he just thinks that Trump will restrict him less/allow him to make more money/is easier to exploit.
    • nidnogg 50 minutes ago
      It would absolutely strike me as a Trump thing, yes. We have a habit of mirroring the US, and it shows
    • matheusmoreira 29 minutes ago
      Possibly. All things point to Bolsonaro's son winning the election today. He's a Trump ally.

      If the Brazilian right wins, then it will mean that not a single left wing party has won an election in South America since the end of USAID.

    • Vaushite 1 hour ago
      [dead]
  • quaddoggy 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • platevoltage 1 hour ago
      Are you claiming that Al Jazeera fabricated this report?
      • derektank 1 hour ago
        *Reuters report. This is a wire story
  • RockRobotRock 2 hours ago
    damned if you do, damned if you don't
    • gchamonlive 46 minutes ago
      By which frame of comparison do you say they were ever "damned even though they didn't"?